Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E

 Nomadic artisans, merchants, and prospectors form an interconnected network that navigates smooth spaces and matter-flows. Their roles are defined by mutual dependence:

  1. Artisans (e.g., metallurgists): Follow the flow of matter, relying on prospectors to extract raw materials and merchants to transport resources and distribute finished goods.
  2. Nomadic Prospectors: Operate in smooth spaces, initiating the flow of materials like metals from mines, which connect nomadic and sedentary groups.
  3. Merchants: Act as intermediaries, linking prospectors and artisans by transporting materials and goods across nomadic and sedentary spaces.

Mines serve as critical points of connection, illustrating the dynamic interplay between these roles. Their collaboration highlights the adaptability and interdependence of nomadic and sedentary systems.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: Illustrating the interactions between artisans, merchants, and prospectors

 Illustrating the interactions between artisans, merchants, and prospectors, emphasizing their interdependence and roles within the flow of matter:

1. Metallurgists and Prospectors

  • Artisans (Metallurgists): Metallurgists are itinerant artisans who follow the flow of matter, particularly metal from the subsoil. They depend on prospectors to locate and extract raw materials like tin or iron.
  • Prospectors: Prospectors initiate the flow by identifying and extracting metals from mines, which are often located in remote areas like deserts or mountains. Their work connects smooth spaces (nomadic) and striated spaces (sedentary).
  • Example: In ancient empires, tin for bronze was sourced from distant regions like Spain or Cornwall, requiring prospectors to locate and extract the material before it could be transported to metallurgists.

2. Merchants as Mediators

  • Role of Merchants: Merchants act as intermediaries, transporting raw materials from prospectors to artisans and distributing finished goods to markets. They reverse the flow of matter by bringing resources to artisans, enabling them to avoid traveling themselves.
  • Example: Merchants facilitated the movement of ingots and charcoal to metallurgists, allowing workshops to operate near forests for fuel while maintaining connections to distant mines.

3. Revolutionary Conversions

  • Hybrid Roles: In revolutionary contexts, the roles of artisans, merchants, and prospectors often blend. For example, during the Hussite Wars, peasants converted oxcarts (tools of agriculture) into mobile fortresses (weapons of war), demonstrating the fluidity of roles and objects.
  • Example: This conversion highlights how artisans, merchants, and prospectors can adapt their roles to meet the demands of war or resistance.

4. Nomadic and Sedentary Relations

  • Artisans and Nomads: Metallurgists often interacted with nomads, as mines were located in smooth spaces controlled by nomadic peoples. This required negotiations and alliances between artisans and nomads.
  • Artisans and Sedentaries: Metallurgists also relied on sedentary farmers for food and charcoal, creating a network of interdependence between different societal groups.
  • Example: The control of mines often involved complex politics, with empires, nomads, and sedentary communities negotiating extraction, transportation, and production.

5. Chain of Mobile Workshops

  • Collaborative Networks: Metallurgists, prospectors, and merchants formed a chain of mobile workshops, moving from hole to hole (mines) and creating a line of variation. This network connected distant regions and facilitated the continuous flow of matter.
  • Example: The ingot-form of metal was common to all segments, symbolizing the shared work of prospectors, merchants, and artisans.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate the interconnected roles of artisans, merchants, and prospectors in following and sustaining the flow of matter. Their interactions highlight the adaptability of their roles and the importance of collaboration in shaping production, commerce, and societal structures.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: The relationship between artisans, merchants, and prospectors

 The relationship between artisans, merchants, and prospectors is deeply interconnected, shaped by their roles in following flows of matter and their dependence on one another within broader societal and economic systems.

 Here is an analysis based on the document:

1. Artisans as Itinerants

  • Definition: Artisans are defined as those who follow the flow of matter, embodying pure productivity. They are itinerants, moving to where the matter-flow leads them, such as metallurgists who work with subsoil materials like metal.
  • Dependence on Prospectors: Artisans are incomplete without prospectors, who locate and extract raw materials. The separation of artisans from prospectors diminishes their autonomy, transforming them into "workers" within a segmented system.
  • Dependence on Merchants: Artisans rely on merchants to transport materials and products, enabling them to avoid making the journey themselves. Merchants reverse the flow by bringing materials to artisans and distributing their finished goods.

2. Prospectors as Flow Initiators

  • Role: Prospectors are the first link in the chain, identifying and extracting raw materials from the earth. They initiate the flow of matter that artisans follow.
  • Connection to Merchants: Prospectors depend on merchants to transport extracted materials to artisans or markets. This creates a chain of movement that links the subsoil to production and commerce.

3. Merchants as Mediators

  • Role: Merchants mediate between prospectors and artisans, facilitating the movement of materials and goods. They follow a circuit rather than a flow, moving between points of departure and arrival (e.g., import-export, buy-sell).
  • Dependence on Artisans and Prospectors: Merchants rely on prospectors for raw materials and artisans for finished goods to trade. Their role is essential for connecting production to consumption.

4. Interdependence and Fragmentation

  • Interdependence: The three groups form a chain of productivity, with each relying on the others to complete the cycle of extraction, production, and distribution.
  • Fragmentation: The separation of these roles into distinct groups (prospectors, merchants, artisans) fragments the flow of matter and diminishes the holistic nature of artisanship. This segmentation aligns with the organization of labor under state or imperial systems.

5. Metallurgy as a Case Study

  • Artisans-Metallurgists: Metallurgists are the first specialized artisans, forming collective bodies like guilds and secret societies. They depend on prospectors for metal and on merchants for charcoal and transportation.
  • Nomadic and Sedentary Relations: Metallurgists interact with nomads and sedentary communities, bridging smooth spaces (nomadic) and striated spaces (sedentary). Mines, as sources of flow, connect these groups through shared interests in extraction and trade.

6. Broader Implications

  • Economic Systems: The relationship between artisans, merchants, and prospectors reflects broader economic systems, where specialization and segmentation create interdependence but also limit autonomy.
  • Deterritorialization: Metallurgy exemplifies the deterritorialized nature of matter-flow, connecting diverse groups and spaces through the movement of materials.

Conclusion

The relationship between artisans, merchants, and prospectors is one of mutual dependence, shaped by the flow of matter and the segmentation of roles. While artisans embody pure productivity, their reliance on prospectors and merchants highlights the interconnected nature of production and commerce. This dynamic also reflects broader societal structures, where specialization and segmentation influence the autonomy and roles of different groups.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: War Machines and State Power

 

War Machines and State Power

  • The nomad war machine is not primarily about war, but about occupying and moving through smooth space.
  • States appropriate the war machine, transforming it into organized armies with war as their direct object.
  • This shift leads to total war, where entire populations and economies become targets.
  • The process is fraught with risks: nomads risk becoming part of the State, while States risk unleashing uncontrollable war machines.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: Smiths: Hybrids of Space and Society

 

Smiths: Hybrids of Space and Society

  • Smiths are neither fully nomadic nor sedentary; they are itinerant, inhabiting 'holey' spaces like caves or underground huts.
  • Their social role is unique: mixed, endogamous, and often forming twin lineages.
  • Smiths communicate with both nomads and sedentaries, acting as technological and social bridges.
  • Their ambiguous status leads to complex affective relations—honored, feared, or scorned depending on context.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: Artisans and Metallurgy - The Matter-Flow

 

Artisans and Metallurgy: The Matter-Flow

  • Artisans are defined by their ability to follow the flow of matter, especially metals, rather than being tied to land or animals.
  • Metallurgy reveals a 'material vitalism'—a life within matter, often hidden in other crafts.
  • Metallurgists are the first specialized artisans, forming collective bodies and secret societies.
  • Their work connects them to both nomads (for resources) and sedentaries (for sustenance), highlighting complex interdependence.

Deleuze - Nomadology - Split E: Unveiling the Dynamics of Nomadology

Unveiling the Dynamics of Nomadology

Explore the intricate relationships between nomads, artisans, and the evolution of war machines.

  • Nomads & Smooth Space: Nomads are defined by their occupation of smooth, open spaces, shaping unique social and military structures.
  • Artisans & Metallurgy: Artisans, especially metallurgists, follow the flow of matter, creating a vital link between subsoil resources and societal development.
  • War Machine Transformation: The war machine, originally a nomadic invention, is appropriated by States, shifting its purpose from creative movement to organized destruction.
  • Smiths as Hybrids: Smiths bridge nomadic and sedentary worlds, inhabiting 'holey' spaces and forming unique social bonds.

Understanding these dynamics offers fresh perspectives on history, technology, and power—helpful for analyzing social change and innovation.